Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Cummer v. Pace
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided December 10, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.
This is the second appearance of this case here. See State, ex rel. Cummer v. Pace, City Auditor, et al, 118 Fla. 496, 159 Sou. 679.
It comes before us now on demurrer to the several paragraphs of the amended answer and return to the alternative writ of mandamus. The controlling question for our determination is whether or not paragraph XIII of the answer is sufficient to overcome the infirmities pointed out in the answer as it stood on the sustaining of the demurrers by the opinion and judgment above referred to. Paragraph XIII of the answer is as follows:
Further answering said alternative…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- In Re Board of Rapid Transit RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
- Martin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Clement v. GrahamSupreme Court of Vermont · 1906
- Hobbs v. Tom Reed Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gate City Garage v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- City of Orlando v. EvansSupreme Court of Florida · 1938