Legal Opinion

Japan Sun Oil Co., Ltd. v. M/V MAASDIJK

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided September 29, 1994No. Civ. A. 94-1383PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRIGAN, District Judge.

The defendant lino Kaium Kaisha Ltd. (Tokyo) (“IKK”) filed a Motion to Compel and to Stay Litigation pending Arbitration which was submitted on briefs. Having considered the memoranda of counsel, the exhibits, the record, and the applicable law, the Court GRANTS the IKK motion for the following reasons:

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs cargo of rubber process oil, which had been loaded aboard the M/V MAASDIJK at Burnside, Louisiana, allegedly arrived in Yokohama, Japan “short in quantity and contaminated and damaged severely.” Document 1, p. 4. In this court, plaintiff, a…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Arbitration Between Standard Tallow Corp. & Kil-Management A/SDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  2. Royal White Cement, Inc. v. Weco Holli M/VDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API