Legal Opinion

Burner v. Higman & Skinner Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 13, 1907PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal frorg, Woodbury District Court.— Hon. F. It. Gaynor, Judge Suit to recover damages for a personal injury. Triál to a jury and verdict and judgment for tbe plaintiff. The defendants Martin appeal.—

1Opinion of the Court

Sherwin, J.—

This is the second appeal in this case. The opinion on the first appeal will be found in 127 Iowa, 580, where a full statement of' the facts will be found, and we need not repeat them. On the second trial there was a judgment against Higman & Skinner Company and James P. and T. S. Martin, and the Martins alone appeal. The lease from the Martins to Higman & Skinner Company contained this clause: “ And it is further covenanted and agreed by the parties aforesaid that said lessee to have the right in common with other tenants of said building to the use of the said freight elevator…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Burner v. Higman & Skinner Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Gardner v. KnightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Orr v. MortvedtSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
  2. Wedman v. CarpenterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  3. King v. Edward Thompson Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. State v. KronstadtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  5. Orr v. MortvedtSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API