State v. Christopher John Kerr
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Dissent
REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY, J. (dissenting).
¶ 76 The majority applies federal Exclusionary Rule jurisprudence in this case despite the fact that the United States Supreme Court has never addressed whether that rule applies in the context of a void ab initio warrant. We have our own Constitution in the State of Wisconsin and it provides: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated; and no warrant shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. DearbornWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.