Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Christopher John Kerr

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 2018No. 2016AP002455-CRPublished

1Dissent

REBECCA GRASSL BRADLEY, J. (dissenting).

¶ 76 The majority applies federal Exclusionary Rule jurisprudence in this case despite the fact that the United States Supreme Court has never addressed whether that rule applies in the context of a void ab initio warrant. We have our own Constitution in the State of Wisconsin and it provides: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated; and no warrant shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. DearbornWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API