Legal Opinion

Sam v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 24, 1987No. Appeals, Nos. 483 C.D. 1985, 488 C.D. 1985 and 489 C.D. 1985PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Doyle,

These are consolidated appeals by Edward M. Sam, Elizabeth J. Sam, and Edward M. Sam, Jr., (Claimants) from orders of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (Board) that denied each claimant benefits pursuant to Section 402(h) of the Unemployment Compensation Law (Law),1 43 PS. §802(h) (self-employment provision).

*626The facts are uncontested. All three Claimants were co-owners of a family-held corporation, Edison Corporation (Corporation). Claimant Edward Sam was president and owned twenty-six percent of the stock; Claimant Edward M. Sam Jr. was vice president and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Starinieri Unemployment Compensation CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Bagley & Huntsberger, Inc. v. Employer Accounts Review BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Lafond v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Riley v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kroh v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Leace v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. J.L. Sindoni v. UCBRCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. Kroh v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API