Legal Opinion

B. & K., INC. v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1960No. Appeal, 17PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Benjamin R. Jones,

In this eminent domain proceeding appellant claims that the court below erred in permitting the admission into evidence of certain testimony at the trial.

On May 21, 1953, B. & K., Inc., 1 the appellant purchased a 57 acre tract of land situated in York County, a tract Avliich parallels Route 111 connecting Harrisburg and York. On or about May 7, 1957 the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania converted Route 111 into a “limited access” highway and, as a result thereof, the only access available to appellant’s land was at the “southern extreme” of such land. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Greenfield v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Rea v. Pittsburg & Connellsville RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  3. Berger v. Public Parking Authority of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. Lutz Et Ux. v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  5. Graham Farm Land Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gottus v. Allegheny County Redevelopment AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Rednor & Kline, Inc. v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Frontage, Inc. v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Durika v. Derry Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Lewis v. Urban Redevelopment AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API