Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Carkulis v. District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial District

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1987No. 87-164PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheehy

In this case, we determine that the reciprocal pretrial discovery statutory provisions in criminal cases, for the purposes of this case and when applied as herein directed, are amenable to the state and federal constitutions and not barred by the provisions of the state and federal constitutions herein specified.

This is an original proceeding in this Court. Relator James Carkulis stands charged with the commission of a crime in the District Court, Thirteenth Judicial District, County of Yellowstone. The State had moved the District Court for an order requiring reciprocal discovery by the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. Lester Kills on TopMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. JacksonMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. HuertaMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. FinaMontana Supreme Court · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API