Legal Opinion

Center for Biological Diversity v. US Fish and Wildlife Service

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 14, 2004No. CIV.A. 03-1110(JDB)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BATES, District Judge.

In this action brought under the citizen suit provision of the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1540(g), and the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706, the Center for Biological Diversity and the Western Watersheds Project (collectively, “plaintiffs”) challenge as arbitrary and capricious the finding of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”) that the listing of the Montana fluvial arctic grayling (a salmonid fish) as a threatened or endangered species is “warranted but precluded” by other priorities, and that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Patrick Esch v. Clayton K. Yeutter, Secretary, U.S. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  2. Center for Biological Diversity v. Gale Norton, Secretary of the Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement And Power District v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  4. St. Luke's Hospital v. ThompsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jacob I. Velazquez v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API