Legal Opinion

Spangler v. Trogler

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 9, 1910No. Appeal, No. 153PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal, No. 153, Jan. T., 1909, by defendant, from order of C. P. Franklin Co., Sept. T., 1906, No. 83, making absolute rule to bring ejectment in case of Henry Spangler and D. W. Faust v. William A. Trogler. Petition for rule to bring ejectment.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 153, Jan. T., 1909, by defendant, from order of C. P. Franklin Co., Sept. T., 1906, No. 83, making absolute rule to bring ejectment in case of Henry Spangler and D. W. Faust v. William A. Trogler. Petition for rule to bring ejectment. A. O. Smith, P. J., specially presiding, filed the following opinion: This is a proceeding brought under the provisions of the Act of assembly passed March 8, 1889, P. L. 10, as amended by the Act of April 16, 1903, P. L. 212. The' petitioners presented their petition April 30, 1906, alleging title in fee simple to a certain tract of timber land…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Smith, specially presiding.

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sutton v. MillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. In re Foster's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  3. Roberts v. Estate of PursleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Dice v. ReeseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Seven Springs Farm, Inc. v. KingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API