Legal Opinion

Graham v. National Bank

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided July 12, 1922No. 69PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rodney, J.,

delivering the opinion of the court:

It has been uniformly held that statutes such as that under discussion, create no new cases of interpleader, but that the statutory remedy as to all cases falling within its provisions is a mere substitute for the equitable remedy by independent suit and is governed by the same rules. 4 Pomeroy, Eq. (4th Ed.) §§ 1329, 1482.

The authorities are comparatively uniform in requiring the following elements, among others, to be present when the equitable principle of interpleader is sought to be invoked:

1. The same thing, debt or duty must be claimed by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. BurdettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. KidderIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. National Life Insurance v. PingreyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  4. Rauch v. Fort Dearborn National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Pfister v. WadeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Westwood Ford Sale, C., Inc. v. BlumenbergNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
  2. Sperling & Slater v. SilkRoad, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API