Legal Opinion

Pfister v. Wade

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1880No. 6,619PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, in the Twentieth District Court, County of Santa Clara. Belden, J.

1Opinion of the Court

McKinstry, J.:

The complaint is as follows:

“ Plaintiffs above named complain of defendants above named, and for cause of action aver:
“ That said plaintiffs for several years last past have been and now are copartners, doing business under the firm-name, and style of A. Pfister & Co. at the City of San José, in the County of Santa Clara, State of California. That on or about the 31st day of December, a. d. 1877, said plaintiffs purchased of one William Trenouth, the assignor of defendant Bliss above named, a certain quantity of wheat then being in the warehouse of defendant Wade above named, at…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Barry v. . Mutual Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Bedell v. HoffmanNew York Court of Chancery · 1830
  3. School District No. 1 v. WestonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Dreyer v. RauchNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1871
  5. Bell v. HuntNew York Court of Chancery · 1848

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. City of Morgan Hill v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Hancock Oil Co. v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Pfister v. WadeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. KidderIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Lowry v. Downing Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1917

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API