Legal Opinion

United States v. Dist. Council of NYC & Vicinity of Carpenters

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 6, 1995No. 90 Civ. 5722 (CSH)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HAIGHT, District Judge:

This opinion emanates from a Consent Decree entered into by the United States (the “Government”) and the District Council of New York City and Vicinity of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America (“District Council”), settling a civil RICO action brought by the Government against the union and certain of its officers in September of 1990. In that action, the Government alleged, in substance, that certain former officers and representatives of the District Council and its constituent locals (collectively, the “Union”) had…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Finnegan v. LeuSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Wirtz v. Glass Bottle BlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Local No. 82, Furniture & Piano Moving, Furniture Store Drivers, Helpers, Warehousemen & Packers v. CrowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Hodgson v. United Mine Workers of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1972
  5. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor, James Ricks v. Local 6, Washington Teachers' Union, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Greene v. BabbittDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1996
  2. Hopkins v. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  3. Reich v. Local 396, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & HelpersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  4. Crutchfield v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2002
  5. Maine v. ShalalaDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API