People v. Adams
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WORK, J.
Ronnie W. Adams appeals a judgment convicting him of two counts of rape (Pen. Code, 1 § 261, subd. (2)—counts one and three), oral copulation (§ 288a, subd. (c)—count two), and burglary (§ 459—count four), each while personally using a deadly weapon (§§ 12022.3, subd. (a), 12022, subd. (b)). He contends the trial court erred in failing to rule on his Evidence Code section 352 motion, in its instructions, in its comments to the jury, and in several sentencing decisions. The court erred in imposing a full-term sentence for the oral copulation and in finding it lacked jurisdiction…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. Rincon-PinedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. McIntyreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- People v. JamisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. GammageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. MunizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- People v. BlassingillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- People v. HollisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- People v. GammageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.