Legal Opinion

Mark Foley v. Martin Biter

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 14, 2015No. 12-17724PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHRISTEN, Circuit Judge:

Mark Foley appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6). Foley, who was convicted of murder in California state court, properly filed a petition for habeas corpus in federal district court in 2001. The district court denied his petition in 2004. Foley’s counsel, Mark Greenberg, forgot that he represented Foley and never informed Foley that the court denied his petition. Foley only discovered that his petition was denied six years later when he sent a letter to the court…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Holland v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Klapprott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Maples v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. Judy Lehman, Wife Mark Lehman, Husband v. United States of America, Judy Lehman, Wife Mark Lehman, Husband v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Michael Bynoe v. Isidro BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. Rowan Brooks v. James YatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. Rowan Brooks v. James YatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. (HC) Coronado v. YarboroughDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
  5. (PC) Moore v. FoxDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API