Rowan Brooks v. James Yates
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM Opinion; Concurrence by Judge KOZINSKI.
OPINION
2Per curiam
Rowan Brooks, currently serving an indeterminate sentence of twenty-five years to life in a California state prison for first-degree murder,, .appeals from the denial of his motion for relief from judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) following the district court’s dismissal of his habeas petition as untimely. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm in.part, reverse in part, and remand. .
I
The district court did not abuse its discretion in holding that Brooks failed to demonstrate that he was entitled to…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Benito Luna v. Scott KernanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Doe v. BusbyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Rudin v. MylesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Andrew MacKey v. Thomas HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Michael Bynoe v. Isidro BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Gill v. HolbrookDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
- Jacob Briseno v. James S. HillDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
- Jones 322621 v. HenryDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
- Willard Hall v. F. HawsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017