State v. Anderson
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.
*44**394A trial court may exclude relevant evidence if the "probative value [of the evidence] is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice." OEC 403. In this case, the trial court admitted a booking video of defendant over an OEC 403 objection because the video bore on the central issue in the case-the identity of the person who had taken money from the victim's bank account. A divided Court of Appeals reversed the trial court's ruling, not because the trial court had abused its discretion in admitting the video but because it had failed to sufficiently explain the basis for its…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. MayfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. TurnidgeOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. BarkleyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. BlackOregon Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. BoauodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. MolesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Botofan-Miller v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 2019
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.