Legal Opinion

Worthington v. Griesser

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1902PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Henry R. Worthington, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 19th day of March, 1902, upon the dismissal of the complaint at the opening of a trial at the New York Trial Term, upon the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

1Opinion of the Court

Hatch, J.:

The complaint avers, among other things, “ that it was at all the times hereinafter mentioned, and still is, the law of the State of Illinois that whenever any person or persons, being or pretending to be officers or agents or directors of any stock corporation or pretended stock corporation organized or pretended to be organized under the laws of the State of Illinois, assume to exercise corporate powers or use the name of any such corporation or pretended corporation, without first filing, or causing to be filed on behalf of such corporation or pretended corporation, in the office…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marshall v. . ShermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. King v. . BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Stoddard v. . LumNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Hagmayer v. FarleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brandes Meat Corp. v. CromerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Conway v. SametNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Arrow, Edelstein & Gross, P.C. v. Rosco Productions, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  4. Perrine v. LevinNew York Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Perrine v. LevinAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API