Adams v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance
District Court, M.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CLAY D. LAND, District Judge.
This action arises from Defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company’s denial of Plaintiff Alan Adams’s long-term disability benefits. Plaintiff contends that Defendant, operating under a conflict of interest, arbitrarily terminated his long-term disability benefits in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”). Defendant responds that its decision to terminate Plaintiffs long-term disability benefits was right, but that even if it was de novo wrong, it was nonetheless reasonable under the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Lewis v. CallahanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Olan Jett v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc., Medical Expense PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Acree v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2013
- Lamb v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2012
- Lann v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2019
- LEGHORN v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICADistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2021