Legal Opinion

Adams v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance

District Court, M.D. Georgia

Decided March 10, 2010No. 4:08-mj-00053PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CLAY D. LAND, District Judge.

This action arises from Defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company’s denial of Plaintiff Alan Adams’s long-term disability benefits. Plaintiff contends that Defendant, operating under a conflict of interest, arbitrarily terminated his long-term disability benefits in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”). Defendant responds that its decision to terminate Plaintiffs long-term disability benefits was right, but that even if it was de novo wrong, it was nonetheless reasonable under the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Lewis v. CallahanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  5. Olan Jett v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc., Medical Expense PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Acree v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2013
  2. Lamb v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2012
  3. Lann v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2019
  4. LEGHORN v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICADistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API