Legal Opinion

LEGHORN v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA

District Court, M.D. Georgia

Decided June 23, 2021No. 5:20-cv-00217Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION GARI LEGHORN, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:20-CV-217 (MTT) ) THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE ) COMPANY OF AMERICA, ) ) ) Defendant. ) __________________ ) ORDER Defendant The Prudential Insurance Company of America (“Prudential”) moves for summary judgment on Plaintiff Gari Leghorn’s claim under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B), for disability benefits allegedly owed under the Perdue Farms, Inc. Group Disability Policy. For the following reasons,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Olan Jett v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc., Medical Expense PlanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  5. Blankenship v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API