Legal Opinion

Latex Allergen Reduction, LLC v. Dynarex Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 21, 2011No. 10 C 129Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ELAINE E. BUCKLO, District Judge.

Plaintiff Latex Allergen Reduction, LLC (“LAR”) has brought this suit against defendant Dynarex Corporation (“Dynarex”) for patent infringement of LAR’s U.S. Patent 5,777,004 (the “'004 Patent”). The '004 Patent is directed to a method of neutralizing protein allergens found in natural rubber latex. '004 Patent, Col. 2, lines 24-25. The proteins in natural rubber latex that cause allergic reactions are made of chemical chains called “peptides,” which are themselves chemical chains of amino acids. The patented invention re lies on a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  2. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  3. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  4. Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  5. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API