Legal Opinion
Feustel v. CareerStaff Unlimited, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 25, 2015No. Case No. 1:14-cv-264Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MICHAEL R. BARRETT, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant CareerStaff Unlimited, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss Count II for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (Doc. 10), Plaintiff Judy Feustel’s (“Plaintiff’) memorandum in opposition (Doc. 13), Defendant’s reply (Doc. 15), Plaintiffs notice of supplemental authority (Doc. 16), and Defendant’s response to the notice of *769supplemental authority (Doc. 22). This matter is ripe for review.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Allegations
The following factual allegations are taken from Plaintiffs Complaint:
Plaintiff…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Robert W. Ritchie, Personally and in His Capacity as a Partner/officer of Ritchie, Fels & Dillard, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.