Legal Opinion

State v. Pac

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1990No. CR-90-0003-PRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAMERON, Justice.

I. JURISDICTION

Defendant, James Leo Pac, petitions this court for review of a court of appeals’ opinion that affirmed his conviction and sentence. We granted review because of conflicting opinions in the court of appeals. See State v. Pac, 163 Ariz. 58, 785 P.2d 1246 (App.1989) and State v. Lee, 160 Ariz. 489, 774 P.2d 228 (App.1989). We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3), and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.

II. ISSUE

We address only one question on review: Was defendant’s guilty plea knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made even though the trial judge…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. CrowderArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. EllisArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  5. State v. PacCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Craig Michael StefanovichCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  2. State v. PacCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  3. State of Arizona v. Rey David VillegasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  4. Armando A. Lopez v. Roger Crist, Warden Grant Woods, Attorney General, of the State of Arizona Samuel LewisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  5. State v. BrockArizona Supreme Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API