Legal Opinion

State v. Pac

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 14, 1993No. Nos. 1 CA-CR 91-1226-PR, 1 CA-CR 92-0513-PRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*190OPINION

GRANT, Presiding Judge.

In State v. Pac, 165 Ariz. 294, 798 P.2d 1303 (1990), our supreme court held that the plea of James Leo Pac (“defendant”) was not made involuntary by the trial court’s failure to inform him of his statutory ineligibility for early release credits. In these consolidated petitions for review, we are called upon to decide whether defendant Pac was denied effective assistance of counsel by his trial counsel’s failure to so inform him. We conclude that the defendant was not denied effective assistance of counsel. We also address other issues raised in the petitions,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  3. State v. PacArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. PacCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Krone v. HothamArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Eric Mann v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Celaya v. StewartDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2010
  4. Eric Mann v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API