Legal Opinion

Matter of Yeomans v. Gaska

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 20, 2017No. 524772PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMulvey, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Broome County (Miller II, J.), entered March 9, 2017, which, in five proceedings pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, granted respondent’s motion to disqualify petitioner’s counsel.

Petitioner (hereinafter the mother) and respondent (hereinafter the father) are the parents of a child (born in 2011). The mother and the father had previously litigated the child’s custody in 2013, at which time attorney Mary Jane Murphy represented the father. In August 2016, the mother filed two pro se petitions to modify the existing custody order and, thereafter,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tekni-Plex, Inc. v. Meyner & LandisNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Kassis v. Teacher's Insurance & Annuity Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. R.M. Buck Construction Corp. v. Village of SherburneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. Matter of Tartakoff v. New York State Education DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. McCutchen v. 3 Princesses and A P Trust Dated February 3, 2004Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of the Guardianship of J.W.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API