Legal Opinion
United States v. Mario Joaquin Vite-Espinoza Jose Martinez-Rivera (02-5492)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 21, 2003No. 02-5491, 02-5492PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBoggs, J., joined by Suhrheinrich, J.,
CLAY, J. (pp. 471-475), delivered a separate opinion concurring in the outcome reached by the majority.
OPINION
BOGGS, Circuit Judge.
Defendants Mario Joaquin Vite-Espino-za and Jose Martinez-Rivera appeal the district court’s denial of their motion to suppress, on Fourth Amendment grounds, firearms found in their possession and statements they made as they were taken into custody. A joint federal, state, and local police task force investigating the counterfeiting of immigration and identifi*465cation documents executed a valid federal search warrant on a house in Springfield, Tennessee, owned and…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. MarroccoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Troy HockenberryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Mike CoffeltCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.