Legal Opinion

McClellan v. Routh

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 18, 1897PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Harris. Tried below before Hon. John G. Tod.

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Associate Justice.

From the answer of the garnishee and from the evidence, it appeared that Clark, the judgment debtor, had borrowed from the Michigan Loan & Savings Association $16,000, which had been deposited with the garnishee, who was the agent of the association, to be disbursed as stated below, and that, at the date of the service of the writ, there remained in the garnishee’s bands $498.12 of this sum. The court below held that this belonged to Clark, and was subject to the writ.

The money was loaned to enable Clark to purchase a lot and erect upon it a building, and before…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carter Bros. & Co. v. BushTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WareTexas Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. ConnerTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. BeckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Hall v. Nunn Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. Alexander v. BerkmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  5. Callihan v. Colorado Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API