Legal Opinion
United States v. Javier Saenz-Gomez
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 2, 2007No. 06-2148PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Javier Saenz-Gomez pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after removal following a conviction for an aggravated felony in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)(1), (2), and (b)(2) and was sentenced to a thirty-month term of imprisonment. On appeal, Saenz-Gomez argues that the district court erred in enhancing his sentence pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(B). We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 1
I
On February 13, 2001, a state grand jury returned a two-count indictment charging Saenz-Gomez with possession with…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Edwards v. ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- White v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Wright v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. CuevasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- United States v. ZamudioCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Omar Gomaa Orabi v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Planes v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Ribas v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Jimenez-Guzman v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- J. M. ACOSTABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.