Marshall v. City of Kansas City
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Wyandotte district court, division No. 2; Frank D. Hutchings, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, C. J.:
May Kansas City, Mo., which is conducting a water plant in Kansas, be sued in this state, and may summons be served on an agent of that city who is in charge of the plant and managing the business conducted here ?
Vina Marshall, who had sustained a personal injury resulting from the negligence of the city in the care of its streets, brought this action in Wyandotte county, Kansas, where the Quindaro pumping station of Kansas City, Mo., is located. It is owned and operated by that city in Kansas in connection with a municipal water system…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State ex rel. Taggart v. HolcombSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Hunt v. Town of PownalSupreme Court of Vermont · 1837
- Phillips v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
- City of North Yakima ex rel. Whitson v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Jones v. Town of StatesvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Williams v. City of Lake CitySupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Hillhouse v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- National Shawmut Bank v. City of WatervilleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Eastern Union Co. of Delaware, Inc. v. Moffat Tunnel Improvement DistrictSuperior Court of Delaware · 1934
- City of St. Petersburg v. EarleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.