Legal Opinion
A.B. Dick Co. v. Burroughs Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 10, 1985No. 78 C 75PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW and JUDGMENT ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
A.B. Dick Company (“Dick”) has sued Burroughs Corporation (“Burroughs”) for patent infringement. After a bench trial (including the usual submission of voluminous documents), the parties have submitted post-trial cross-memoranda and responsive memoranda, as well as revised proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law (all of these also voluminous, though not needlessly so in light of the complex subject matter).
In accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 52(a), this Court finds the facts specially as set forth in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- A.B. Dick Company, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Burroughs Corporation, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Amgen, Inc. v. Hoechst Marion Roussel, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Select Creations, Inc. v. Paliafito America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1992
- Consolidated Aluminum Corp. v. Foseco International Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- Halliburton Co. v. Schlumberger Technology Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1989