Legal Opinion
Harrison v. City of Fall River
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 24, 1926PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.
The plaintiff in each of the above entitled actions, which sounded in contract, on January 9, 1925, was duly enrolled in the classified civil service and permanently employed in the water department of the city of Fall River. The plaintiffs Harrison and Prevost on January 9, 1925, and Grime on January 10,1925, each received a notice from the said water department to the effect that he was suspended or laid off because “of a lack of funds in the department.” On their applications, the plaintiffs Harrison and Prevost were given a hearing by the water board, but no notice of its decision was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Foye v. PatchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
- Peckham v. Mayor of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Correia v. Supreme Lodge of the Portuguese Fraternity of the United StatesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Ransom v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Baxter v. New England Marine InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Knowlton v. Town of SwampscottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Hill v. Trustees of Glenwood CemeteryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
- Westminster National Bank v. GrausteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Branche v. City of FitchburgMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- City of Boston v. White Fuel Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.