Hall v. Palmer
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Lagrange Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHanna, J.
More than two years after the rendition of a judgment, in said Court, against said Hall, he filed his complaint for a review of the same, alleging two grounds: 1. Error of law appearing in the record, and, second, newly discovered evidence. In the former suit, judgment had been suffered by default. The suit was upon a promissory note, and the defence now sought to be set up, and evidence offered, is to establish that said note was a forgery, or executed through mistake. The names of the witnesses by whom these facts are to be proved, are not given, nor the substance of the testimony of each.…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by10 opinions
- Hines v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Barnes v. DeweyIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Webster v. MaidenIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Hill v. RoachIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Whitehall v. CrawfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.