Legal Opinion
Weisgerber v. Workmen's Compensation Bureau
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 1, 1940No. File No. 6637PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Morris, J..
Bomi'nik Weisgerber, Jr., was killed in the course of his employment on'November 30, 1937. The plaintiff is the father of the deceased.
Within the time required by law, the plaintiff filed with the Workmen’s Compensation Bureau, a claim for compensation pursuant to the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, wherein he listed as among those entitled to compensation, himself and his wife Margaretha Weisgerber, who is the mother of the deceased. He stated in the claim that', both the father and the mother were partially dependent upon the deceased for their support. He also…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Waechter v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1937
- Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Ethen v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- Rhoden v. Smith & Decker Electric Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Public Service Commission v. Wimbledon Grain Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- G. I. Construction Co. v. OsbornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Oklahoma State Highway Department v. NashSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Barney Cockburn & Sons v. LaneNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
- Cepeda Canales v. Comisión IndustrialSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.