Legal Opinion

Danes v. Pearson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 11, 1893No. 653PublishedCited by 26 opinions

From the Sullivan Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtLotz, J.

The appellee brought this action against the-appellants to recover the possession of seven hundred and fifty shocks of wheat. He obtained a judgment in the court below, and from that judgment an appeal was taken to this court. Two errors are assigned here, viz.: (1), the overruling of' a motion for a venire de novo, and (2) the-motion for a new trial.

Appellants’ counsel have considered the last one only, and, under the familiar rule, the first is waived.

One of the causes assigned for a new trial is the alleged misconduct of the judge who presided at the trial. It is-shown by the affidavit of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Watertown Bank and Loan Co. v. . MixNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Waterman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Read v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  4. Selden, Withers & Co. v. Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1859
  5. Wiggins v. DownerNew York Supreme Court · 1884

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. MurphyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  2. State v. MimsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. Deming v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Laine v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Guy v. ViethTennessee Supreme Court · 1988

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API