Legal Opinion

Wehrle v. Cassor

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1986No. 50377PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARY M. GAERTNER, Judge.

Owners of four lots petitioned the City of Eureka’s Board of Adjustment for variances from the City’s setback ordinance. The Board approved the variances, citing financial hardship. Several adjoining and nearby landowners petitioned the St. Louis County Circuit Court for certiorari. The circuit court held that the Board had exceeded its authority and reversed the action of the Board. The Board appeals. Affirmed.

Construction of houses on four lots in the Bald Hill Gardens subdivision began in violation of a Eureka setback ordinance. The ordinance requires houses to be…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Consumer Contact Co. v. State Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. Rosedale-Skinker Improvement Ass'n v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. General Motors Corp. v. Fair Employment Practices Division of the Council on Human Relations of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  4. Wolfner v. Board of AdjustmentMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Conner v. HerdMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hutchens v. St. Louis CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. State ex rel. Branum v. Board of Zoning AdjustmentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. State ex rel. Dotson v. County Commission of Clay CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Bender v. Forest Park Forever, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Arens v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API