Legal Opinion
Arens v. City of St. Louis
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 22, 1994No. Nos. 62719, 62720PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMON, Presiding Judge.
Appellants, City of St. Louis, the Board of Adjustment of the City of St. Louis (Board), Rick Friedewald, et al., members of the Board of Adjustment, and Herman E. Smith, Jr. (Smith), appeal from the judgment of the circuit court reversing the decision of the Board granting a side yard set back variance to Smith.
On appeal, appellants essentially claim the trial court erred in reversing the Board’s decision because the Board’s decision was based on competent and substantial evidence establishing a practical difficulty as a basis for granting the variance. We affirm.
Smith…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matthew v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- Hutchens v. St. Louis CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Karelitz v. SoraghanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Stockwell v. Board of Zoning Adjust. of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- Brown v. St. Louis CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Housing Authority of St. Charles v. Board of Adjustment of St. CharlesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Dailey v. Board of AdjustmentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Raskin v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- JANET DAILEY, CLINT SMITH, SHARON K. JOBE and DONALD W. INGRAM, CO-TRUSTEES of the WILLIAM and JANET DAILEY TRUST, Relators/Petitioners-Respondents v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT of the CITY OF BRANSON, MISSOURI, and the CITY OF BRANSON, MISSOURI, Defendants/Respondents-Appellants.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2014