Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. The Bakersfield Californian
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 19, 1997No. 96-17140PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RYMER, Circuit Judge.
This appeal requires us to decide whether section 11 of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), 29 U.S.C. § 161, gives the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) authority to issue investigative subpoenas to non-parties. The NLRB brought this appeal after the district court refused to order The Bakersfield Californian, a newspaper, to comply with a subpoena duces tecum to produce information about an anonymous employer, against whom an unfair labor practice charge had been filed after it placed an advertisement for workers in the newspaper. The district court held that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Sid Casey v. Federal Trade Commission, Federal Trade Commission v. Sid CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- National Labor Relations Board v. North Bay Plumbing, Inc. Patrick Pettit Elmer Lee Pettit David A. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- O. T. Link, D/B/A Danville Detective Agency v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- National Labor Relations Board, Applicant-Appellee v. Elmer R. Lewis, President, Plastic Workers Union Local 18, L. U. D. T. W., Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Interstate Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Edmonds v. StandcampianoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Edmonds v. StandcampianoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- National Labor Relations Board v. Interstate Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- No. 04-35449Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006