Legal Opinion

Otto v. Rau Petroleum Products

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 19, 1979No. 17425PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARREN, Justice.

Appellee has filed a motion praying for dismissal of this cause on appeal alleging that the appellant has fully paid, satisfied and discharged the money judgment rendered in the trial court and that a full and complete release of said judgment and liens existing by reason thereof has been executed and delivered. Appellant does not dispute the facts alleged in appellee’s motion.

Appellate courts will not decide moot cases or abstractions. Cain, Brogden & Cain, Inc. v. Int’i Brotherhood of Teamsters 155 Tex. 304, 285 S.W.2d 942 (1956). Where a defendant has voluntarily paid the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Travis County v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  2. Cain, Brogden & Cain, Inc. v. Local Union No. 47, International Brotherhood of Teamsters Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & HelpersTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc. v. Southern Conference of TeamstersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Highland Church of Christ v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Tubb v. Vinson Exploration, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Threeway Constructors, Inc. v. Aten, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1983
  4. Highland Church of Christ v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Gibson v. Spinks, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API