Legal Opinion
Axline v. Toledo, W. V. & O. R. CO.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio
Decided December 17, 1903No. 1,135PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, District Judge.
This cause is submitted upon a motion to remand the same to the court of common pleas for the county of Coshocton, in the state of Ohio (the court in which it originated), upon the ground that diverse citizenship, within the meaning of the removal acts, is not shown. Under these acts it is necessary that all the parties on one side of the controversy shall be citizens of a different state or states from all the parties on the other side, and in this case the record shows that the plaintiff and the defendant the Toledo, Walhonding Valley & Ohio Railroad Company are…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hukill v. Maysville & B. S. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1896
- Quested v. Newburyport & Amesbury Horse RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
- Central Ohio R. v. MahoneyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
3Cited by5 opinions
- Breymann v. PENNSYLVANIA, O. & DR CO.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- McAllister v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1912
- Travis v. Kansas City, S. & G. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
- Breymann v. Pennsylvania, Ohio & Detroit Rd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1929
- Beltz v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1905