Breymann v. Pennsylvania, Ohio & Detroit Rd.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
The above-entitled cases will be considered together. In the case brought by James Rooney and the Providence Washington Insurance Company, as plaintiffs, against the Pennsylvania, Ohio & Detroit Railroad Company, as defendant, a demurrer was sustained to the amended petition, and in the case brought by Eugene Breymann et al., as plaintiffs, against the same defendant, a demurrer was sustained to the petition. In each case a final judgment was entered after sustaining the demurrer, as the plaintiffs did not desire to plead further. These proceedings in error are brought to reverse those…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- North Carolina Railroad v. ZacharySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Southern Railway Co. v. LloydSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Arrowsmith v. Nashville & D. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Tennessee · 1893
- Hukill v. Maysville & B. S. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1896
- Chicago Rys. Co. v. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Breymann v. PENNSYLVANIA, O. & DR CO.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
- Goldsmith v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010