Legal Opinion

Breymann v. Pennsylvania, Ohio & Detroit Rd.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 28, 1929PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The above-entitled cases will be considered together. In the case brought by James Rooney and the Providence Washington Insurance Company, as plaintiffs, against the Pennsylvania, Ohio & Detroit Railroad Company, as defendant, a demurrer was sustained to the amended petition, and in the case brought by Eugene Breymann et al., as plaintiffs, against the same defendant, a demurrer was sustained to the petition. In each case a final judgment was entered after sustaining the demurrer, as the plaintiffs did not desire to plead further. These proceedings in error are brought to reverse those…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. North Carolina Railroad v. ZacharySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. LloydSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Arrowsmith v. Nashville & D. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Tennessee · 1893
  4. Hukill v. Maysville & B. S. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1896
  5. Chicago Rys. Co. v. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Breymann v. PENNSYLVANIA, O. & DR CO.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  2. Goldsmith v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API