Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Gulian v. Gulian

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 9, 2001No. 99-207Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Dimotsis, D.J.,

concurring and dissenting. The majority’s conclusion, that the family court failed to separate the maintenance *165award from the child support award, ignores the clear holding of the family court. After performing several child support calculations, the family court ruled that child support was not warranted based on the respective incomes of the parties and the shared parenting arrangement. Disregarding the outcome determined by the child support guidelines, the majority finds error in the apparent result that part of mother’s maintenance will be used toward the support of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kanaan v. KanaanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  2. Ainsworth v. AinsworthSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  3. Leas v. LeasSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API