Ainsworth v. Ainsworth
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
This action for modification of child support calls upon us to interpret Vermont’s recently enacted child support guidelines law, 15 V.S.A. §§ 650-663. Specifically at issue is whether expenses for a second family should enter into the determination of child support for the preexisting family. Although the trial court decided that defendant, Reginald Ainsworth, did not have a duty to support his stepson under 15 V.S.A. § 296, it held, pursuant to § 659, that a child support order based on the guidelines sought by plaintiff, Julie Ann Ainsworth, on her behalf and on behalf of the two children…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Klein v. KleinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Harris v. HarrisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- Victor v. VictorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- Towne v. TowneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- McCormick v. McCormickSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Gazo v. GazoSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
- Adamson v. DodgeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- Hunt v. HuntSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- Grimes v. GrimesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.