Legal Opinion
Parkervision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 13, 2018No. 2017-2012, 2017-2013, 2017-2014, 2017-2074PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O'Malley, Circuit Judge.
*1357 ParkerVision, Inc. ("ParkerVision") appeals from three final written decisions of the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("Board") in related inter partes review proceedings, in which the Board held certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,091,940 ("the '940 patent") unpatentable as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103 (a). Qualcomm Inc. and Qualcomm Atheros, Inc. (together, "Qualcomm") cross-appeal from the Board's determination that Qualcomm failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that certain other claims of the '940 patent are unpatentable. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
A.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hewlett-Packard Company, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Ericsson, Inc. v. D-Link Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Finjan, Inc. v. Secure Computing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- In Re Sang-Su LeeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Intelligent Bio-Systems, Inc. v. Illumina Cambridge Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Parkervision, Inc. v. Qualcomm IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
- Invt Spe LLC v. ItcCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
- 3G Licensing, S.A. v. HTC CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2023
- Catilina Nominees Proprietary Ltd. v. Stericycle, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025
- Invt Spe LLC v. ItcCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.