Legal Opinion

Clark v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1882PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Practice in Supreme Court. At February Term, 1882. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Jackson, Chief Justice.

The only attempt at an assignment of error in this bill of exceptions is couched in such language that we cannot well decipher its meaning. Certainly, it is not that clear and distinct assignment of error, or plain specification thereof, which the law demands. Code, §4251; 1 Kelley, 1; 38 Ga., 554. It is in the following words:

“As on the hearing of said motion the new trial then and there prayed for was denied and refused, the said Emma Clark plaintiff in error as appears of entry on said motion which is now assigned as error.”

Whether the error was based on the time of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dunagan v. DunaganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1868

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Winn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Federal Land Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Ocean Steamship Co. v. Blumberg & SonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API