Legal Opinion
Walsh v. Van Amringe
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1918PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Action for specific performance.
1Opinion of the CourtPlatt, J.
Plaintiff brings an action for specific performance based on three memoranda of the sale.
Plaintiff’s Exhibit 2.
“ New York, Aug. 5th 1916.
“ Received from I. & A. G. Wright as Agents, fifty and no/100 Dollars, same being on acct. of purchase price of 5.19 acres on Tailors Lane as shown on map of Kirby & Son, Price $1500, balance to be paid in ‘30 days. Contract "to be drawn by seller.
“ Augustus Y. Van Amringe. $50.00. ’ ’
Plaintiff’s Exhibit 4.
“ This cheek is void unless receipt is signed by payee.
“I. & A. G. Wright
“ Real Estate and Insurance
“ White Plains, N. Y., Aug. 5th, 1916,
No. 8156.
“ Pay…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mentz v. . NewwitterNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Jones v. BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Pettibone v. MooreNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Carney v. PendletonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Lindenbaum v. MarxAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909
3Cited by1 opinion
- Zilmaur Realty Corp. v. PinkneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924