Zilmaur Realty Corp. v. Pinkney
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Merrell, J.:
_ The action is brought to compel specific performance of an alleged contract for the sale of real property situate on, Columbus
*468avenue in the city of New York. It is the contention of the appellant that the alleged contract sued upon is within the Statute of Frauds (Real Prop. Law, § 259) and is in no respect binding upon him nor enforcible by the plaintiff. The contract sought to be enforced was made on September 12, 1923, and is as ■ follows:
“ New York City, N. Y.,
“ Sept. 12, 1923.
“ Messrs. Brown, Wheelock: Harris, Vought & Co.,
“ 20 East 48th Street, N. Y.:
“ Gentlemen.— I hereby…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ball v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Grafton v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Mentz v. . NewwitterNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Bailey v. OgdenNew York Supreme Court · 1808
- Brown v. . the New York Central R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1870
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Max Miskowitz & Starobin & Miskowitz, Inc. v. StarobinNew York Supreme Court · 1943
- Scriven v. AbramsNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Stearns v. ParkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928