Legal Opinion
Sipple v. Atwood (In Re Atwood)
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided February 12, 1991No. Bankruptcy CV 490-111, 88-41165PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDENFIELD, Chief Judge.
The appellants have moved the Court to reconsider its December 7, 1990 order, which affirmed the bankruptcy court’s order granting summary judgment for the debtor and dismissing the case. The appellant’s motion has merit. Accordingly, the December 7, 1990 order is VACATED. The bankruptcy court’s decision is AFFIRMED IN PART AND VACATED IN PART. The case is remanded to the bankruptcy court, as explained below.
BACKGROUND
The appellants, Charles Sipple III, (“Sip-ple”) and Joel Gibson (“Gibson”), are creditors of the appellee-debtor, James P. Atwood (“Atwood” or “debtor”)…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Norma Rollins v. Techsouth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- In Re Chase & Sanborn Corporation, Debtor. Paul C. Nordberg, Creditor Trustee v. Arab Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- General Trading Inc. v. Yale Materials Handling Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Booher Enterprises v. Eastown Auto Co. (In Re Eastown Auto Co.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- In Re NorrisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1995
- In Re MossUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2000
- In Re CollinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.