Legal Opinion

Sweat v. Mullis

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 11, 1916PublishedCited by 5 opinions

. Complaint for land. Before James E. Thomas, judge pro hac vice. Pierce superior court. August 28, 1915.

1Opinion of the CourtEvans, P. J.

An action of complaint for land was brought by T. N. Sweat against E. M. Miillis. The muniment of title upon which the plaintiff bases his right to recover is a deed dated August 24, 1886, from Nancy Ahl to himself, conveying “all that tract or parcel of land situated, lying, and being in the fourth district of said county of Pierce and known and distinguished in the plan of said district as lot of land number forty-five, being all of said lot of land except forty acres, more or less, on the northeast side of a certain branch known as Boggy Branch in the northeast corner of said lot; said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Payton v. McPhaulSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martin v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Callaway v. BeauchampSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  3. Clay v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  4. Williams v. Thomas CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  5. Durden v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API