Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Durden v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 28, 1994No. S93A1708; S94A0056Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCarley, Justice

I fully concur in the opinion as it relates to Case No. S94A0056. However, I must dissent to the judgment in Case No. S93A1708 because I believe that the trial court did not err in refusing to grant *39partial summary judgment in favor of Durden.

Both the 50-acre tract and the 62-acre tract were conveyed to the same party in a single warranty deed in 1945. The “except” clause described

30 acres more or less situated in the Northwest corner of said tract, which tract is 800 feet more or less from the center of a branch on the south side and 1500 feet more or less from the center of said branch on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Swint v. SwintSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  2. Hollywood Cemetery Corp. v. HudsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. Sweat v. MullisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  4. Richardson v. Georgia Kraft Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API