Legal Opinion

Sysdyne Corporation v. Brian Rousslang

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 4, 2015No. A13-898PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAGE, Justice.

Appellant Sysdyne Corporation sued respondent Xigent Solutions, LLC, for tor-tious interference with contract resulting from Xigent’s hiring of respondent Brian Rousslang — a former employee of Sys-dyne who was subject to a noncompete agreement — and sued Rousslang for breach of contract. Rousslang did not dispute that he breached the noncompete agreement, and the trial court awarded damages to Sysdyne on its breach of contract claim with respect to certain customers Rousslang brought with him from Sys-dyne to Xigent. The trial court ruled in favor of Xigent, however, on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. Furlev Sales & Associates, Inc. v. North American Automotive Warehouse, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Kallok v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. Royal Realty Co. v. LevinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Qwest Communications Company v. Free Conferencing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  2. Gregory Sherr v. HealthEast Care SystemCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  3. Metropolitan Transportation Network, Inc. v. Collaborative Student Transportation of Minnesota, ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  4. Strategic Energy Concepts, LLC v. Otoka Energy, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024
  5. Beck v. DollingerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API