Legal Opinion

Norwich Union Fire Insurance Society v. Girton

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1890No. 14,300PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Elkhart Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlds, J.

This was a suit to recover for a loss under an insurance policy, issued to appellee by appellant. There were two items covered by the policy, one of $500, on a general stock of notions and millinery goods; the other, $200, on household goods. This suit is for the loss of the notions and millinery goods.

The complaint alleges the destruction of the property by fire, and then it alleges that the plaintiff, the appellee, “ had performed all the stipulations and conditions of said policy on his part to be performed, except to furnish proof of said loss to defendant; which proof of loss plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. State ex rel. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Home Insurance v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Aurora Fire & Marine Insurance v. KranichMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. American Central Insurance v. SweetserIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Cates v. BalesIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Germania Fire Insurance v. PitcherIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Seeck v. JakelOregon Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Crane Company v. NewmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
  4. Citizens' Street Railroad v. HortonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Germania Fire Insurance v. StewartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API